Disease Burden and Treatment Preferences Amongst Postmenopausal Women with Severe Osteoporosis in Greece.

Objective: The objectives of this study were to elicit self-reported health status, quantify osteoporosis-related burden, and understand preferences for treatment attributes among postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis in Greece. Methods: Postmenopausal women with self-reported severe osteoporosis, defined as having suffered at least one osteoporotic fracture and reporting a T-score of ≤-2.5, were asked to evaluate their health status, osteoporosis management, and disease-related physical, emotional, and financial burden. Participants were also asked to rate a series of treatment attributes and state their preference for unlabeled anabolic treatments, based on scenarios describing key treatment characteristics. Results: Approximately one third (31%) of the 186 participants who responded to the survey in full had been living with severe osteoporosis for more than 10 years. Three quarters of participants (72%) considered their overall quality of life (QoL) to be worse than it had been 10 years prior, and the vast majority (89%) attributed this deterioration to osteoporosis. Direct, out of pocket, disease-related costs of at least €100 per month were reported by 86% of participants. Patients attached the greatest value to a treatment that would decrease probability of future fractures, followed by increase in bone density, safety, and mode and frequency of administration. When asked to select their preferred treatment scenario between two anabolic treatments, 70% of participants opted for the scenario that shared treatment characteristics with romosozumab over a scenario that shared treatment characteristics with teriparatide. Conclusion: Our study revealed that osteoporosis placed a considerable burden on QoL for postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis in Greece. Patients reported valuing treatment efficacy, measured through reduction in future fractures and increase in bone density, and safety, as key treatment attributes.

Prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients in Greece: the Vertebral Integrity Assessment (VERTINAS) study.

Our purpose was to assess the prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures (VFs) in osteoporotic patients in our country. We found that 25.4% of patients had sustained a VF, and the majority of them (76.6%) were undiagnosed prior to inclusion in this study. INTRODUCTION: We assessed the prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures (VFs) in osteoporotic patients in our country. METHODS: Patients were recruited via announcements by the national media, their attending physicians or the National patients' Society. Inclusion criteria were (1) age > 50 years, (2) postmenopausal status > 2 years (women), (3) > 1-year use of medication for osteoporosis and (4) lack of radiological vertebral assessment for > 1 year. Exclusion criteria were (1) bone metabolic diseases other than osteoporosis, (2) patients with secondary osteoporosis, (3) patients with inability to stand/walk, (4) previous high-energy VFs. All patients performed lateral X-rays of the thoracic and lumbar spine that were evaluated separately both by certified radiologists on site as well as 3 consultant orthopaedic surgeons remotely through a specifically designed web database system. The Genant semi-quantitative method was used for the classification and grading of VFs and statistical analysis of the results was performed. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred fifty-two patients (1516 female, 70.02 ± 8.28 years; 136 male, 74.78 ± 8.25 years) were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of VFs was 25.4%, 76.6% of fractured patients were previously undiagnosed, and of these 39.9% had > 1 VFs. The most common fracture was T12, most fractures were found to be mild (grade 1) across all age groups, and patients 70-79 years and > 80 years were found to have a statistically significantly higher number of fractures than younger patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results of the high prevalence of morphometric VFs emphasise the need for baseline assessment of vertebral fragility in patients receiving treatment for osteoporosis, as well as follow-up radiographs at specified time periods while on therapy.

Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in greek women: normative data are different from the manufacturer's normal range.

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is considered a useful method in evaluating bone status. The aim of the present study was to establish the reference data for the QUS measurements of the calcaneus in a Greek population. We measured a QUS parameter, stiffness index (SI), at the right calcaneus in 1500 women using the Achilles express Ultrasonometer (GE Lunar, Madison, WI). Participants were divided into 7 groups according to their age with a 10-yr span in each group. A progressive decline was found in the SI values after the age of 39 yr in the current study. When the SI values were compared between the age groups, high statistically significant differences were obvious, especially between 20-29 and 50- to 59-yr age groups and 60-69 and 70- to 79-yr age groups (p < 0.0005). Additionally, in the Greek normal range (GNR), the SI values of those aged 60-69 and 70-79 yr were significantly higher (81.84+/-16.14 and 77.45+/-17.65, respectively) than those in the manufacturer's normal range (MNR; 75.84+/-16.14 and 69.10+/-17.65, p < 0.005, respectively). Using the manufacturer's values, significantly fewer women were classified as normal (48% vs 67.3%), although those with T-score < or =-2.5 were more (15.7%) compared with our Greek value (1.5%), and classification of subjects into risk-of-fracture categories was significantly different (kappa: 0.459, 66.2%, p < 0.0005). Multiple regression analysis showed that weight was the most significant predictor for SI in the age groups 30-39 (beta = 0.280, p < 0.05), 40-49, 60-69, and 70-79 yr (beta = 0.185, p < 0.005; beta = 0.329, p < 0.0005; beta = 0.494, p<0.0005, respectively). Using conventional categories of risk, we report a different classification of our subjects from those proposed by the manufacturer, supporting the concept that data specific to the Greek population are necessary.